So, really, the only reason to watch awards shows is to see what the celebs are wearing- I mean that and to see how insulting the host can be. Apparently, Ricky Gervais took it a bit far... Well, I enjoyed watching the red carpet last night with my mom-in-law and here are some of the best and the worst:
![]() |
| Olivia Wilde - its sparkly!! |
![]() |
| Sofia Vergara - Va va voom! |
![]() |
| Julia Stiles - I actually LOVE this dress - she looks great! |
![]() |
| Modern Family rocks my world and so does this dress! Julia Bowen |
![]() |
| Minus the "jack it to Jesus" hair and odd look on her face- loving the emerald green that Mild Kunis is rocking |
![]() | ||
| Amber Riley is ROCKING this dress! love love love! |
![]() |
| ScarJo looking SCARY. Bride o' Frankenstein anyone? |
![]() |
| Why does JLo have to accessorize a perfectly pretty dress with a sheer bedazzled cape? I am baffled. |
![]() |
| Recognize this actress? Me neither - until I read her name: It's Jayma Mays- Miss Pillsbury from Glee! Way to over-done |
![]() |
| Oh Julianne Moore... Why? |
![]() |
| Now, Heidi Klum - Ms. Project Runway should have known better. |
![]() |
| She may have one best actress, but Natalie Portman does not win best dressed in this pink - rose adorned potato sack. |
![]() | ||
| Ah- Helena Bonham Carter. We know you are quirky and love you for it... but did you HAVE to wear 2 different colored shoes? And the Bellatrix hair? The dress really was enough. |
I could not find a simple synopsis for this book that didn't give away the entire thing. So to sum it up: This is a dystopian novel, set in the near future, in the Republic of Gilead- what used to be the United States. The new society is based on extremely literal translations of the Old Testament and is definitely misogynistic. Younger women who are still hoped to be fertile are forced to be Handmaidens- basically a vessel for a child for an older couple to raise as their own.
I am really glad I got some recommendations from my facebook friends for books to read in this year. I appreciated this book and it is one I never would have picked up on my own. It has a little bit of a Hunger Games feel, minus the violence, but full of oppression. It was a bit jolting to read and I think I handled the violence of the Hunger Games better than the brainwashing and twisted theology of this book. The sexual rituals described made me shiver - and not in a good way. It is just creepy. They have these once-monthly rituals where the handmaid lies between a husband and wife, holding the wife's hands while the husband attempts to impregnate her. This makes it ok because the wife is part of the process- they are "one". It is disgusting.
I had a hard time getting into the style of the writing because the entire story is told through the thoughts of the main character and it is very staccato. Her thoughts kind of flit about from one sentence and jerkily on to the next one. It was hard to put together a cohesive story at times because she keeps flashing back to the night when she and her husband and daughter tried to escape. She flashes back to college days and her best friend Moira. She flashes back to time spent with her mother. It all gets a bit jumbled, but I still really got sucked in to Atwood's frightening and strange world she created. I kept wanting to know more. There was a consistent string of suspense throughout the entire novel, like something had to give at any moment. The handmaid was always walking on a fine line.
I have to say, I did like it for the most part, even though it was disturbing. However, I was not satisfied with the ending. It was very abrupt. Just. over. Those of you who know me well, know that I like a resolution and I didn't get one with this ending. I want to know what has happened to our little handmaiden!
And just for fun: Did you know this got made into a movie?! haha I have to watch it- if only to see how they portray Gilead! This cover is much more scandalous than would have been permitted in the book!
Overall rating for the book: 4/5 - it kept me wanting more, but left me unsatisfied in the end, and it creeped me out.
Rating on the movie : To be announced. But I am guessing - bad.
This is a steampunk, paranormal series by Gail Carriger and I am a pretty huge fan. So, gonna do quickie reviews of all three. And, Blameless is the first book of the new year! I have a new goal to read 52 books this year (so 1 per week) and Blameless is numero uno! I will, however, review them in order.
"Buffy the Vampire Slayer" meets Jane Austen in this wickedly funny debut novel, which kicks off Carriger's new series set in an alternate 19th-century London that not only knows about vampires and werewolves, but accepts them into the upper tiers of society. Original.Alexia Tarabotti is laboring under a great many social tribulations. First, she has no soul. Second, she's a spinster whose father is both Italian and dead. Third, she was rudely attacked by a vampire, breaking all standards of social etiquette.
Where to go from there? From bad to worse apparently, for Alexia accidentally kills the vampire -- and then the appalling Lord Maccon (loud, messy, gorgeous, and werewolf) is sent by Queen Victoria to investigate.
With unexpected vampires appearing and expected vampires disappearing, everyone seems to believe Alexia responsible. Can she figure out what is actually happening to London's high society? Will her soulless ability to negate supernatural powers prove useful or just plain embarrassing? Finally, who is the real enemy, and do they have treacle tart?
SOULLESS is a comedy of manners set in Victorian London: full of werewolves, vampires, dirigibles, and tea-drinking.
Soulless is yet another recommendation from my college roomie Liz. And I LOVED it. Alexia is an amazing protagonist. She is sassy, witty, and slightly scandalous. Conall is a wonderful, rough-around-the-edges, sexy beast (quite literally). There is a lot of I-think-I-hate-you-but-I-really-love-you banter that happens between the two as they are pursued and caught by evil scientists. It had me on the edge of my seat and I ate up every page! I love the characters; Professor Lyall, Ivy, Alexia's family and Lord Akeldama are well-developed, individual, and charming characters. There is also plenty of steamy snogging (that's for you Liz). It really could be a stand-alone novel. I loved the setting and the fun inventions that fit into the steam-punk genre that I have just recently discovered (and am totally loving). Sometimes period novels are hard for me, but with the addition of the paranormal and steam-punk elements it kept my interest. 5/5 on this one.
Changeless ***SPOILER ALERT FOR BOOK 1***
Alexia Tarabotti, the Lady Woolsey, awakens in the wee hours of the mid-afternoon to find her husband, who should be decently asleep like any normal werewolf, yelling at the top of his lungs. Then he disappears - leaving her to deal with a regiment of supernatural soldiers encamped on her doorstep, a plethora of exorcised ghosts, and an angry Queen Victoria. But Alexia is armed with her trusty parasol, the latest fashions, and an arsenal of biting civility. Even when her investigations take her to Scotland, the backwater of ugly waistcoats, she is prepared: upending werewolf pack dynamics as only the soulless can. She might even find time to track down her wayward husband, if she feels like it.
This book was good, but didn't have quite as much zing as the first novel. I do love the dynamic between Conall and Alexia, and again, with the witty banter. They have a fun and sweet connection, even though they are both pretty snarky :) I continued to admire Alexia's eccentricities in this novel and her tough, ballsy attitude. However, I figured out the villain AND the cause of the "infection of normality" AND her "condition" before Alexia did. I prefer to experience my characters "AHA" moments and feel like I didn't see it coming. I had mixed feelings about the new androgynous character Madame Lefoux. Since Alexia did not trust her, I didn't either, but I did appreciate the mystery she added to the plot. All in all though, I did enjoy the story and it was the first book in quite awhile that I really just wanted to sit down and read until I knew what happened. So 4/5 for book 2.
*random side note: not a huge fan of this cover. I think it's the model's bangs. I really have an issue w/ them.
Blameless ***Spoiler Alerts for Books 1 AND 2!!***
Quitting her husband's house and moving back in with her horrible family, Lady Maccon becomes the scandal of the London season. Queen Victoria dismisses her from the Shadow Council, and the only person who can explain anything, Lord Akeldama, unexpectedly leaves town. To top it all off, Alexia is attacked by homicidal mechanical ladybugs, indicating, as only ladybugs can, the fact that all of London's vampires are now very much interested in seeing Alexia quite thoroughly dead. While Lord Maccon elects to get progressively more inebriated and Professor Lyall desperately tries to hold the Woolsey werewolf pack together, Alexia flees England for Italy in search of the mysterious Templars. Only they know enough about the preternatural to explain her increasingly inconvenient condition, but they may be worse than the vampires -- and they're armed with pesto.I enjoyed Blameless slightly more than Changeless. I think it is due to more action scenes. Alexia is constantly being attacked by someone for some reason and I did not figure out why! They did try to make me suspicious of one of my favorite characters, and succeeded! I enjoyed seeing more of Floote, the ever-stoic gun-wielding butler. It was also very interesting to learn more about Alexia's father, who is somewhat of a mysterious fellow, only known through his journals. Of course, we know from book 2 that Alexia and her father would have never been able to share the same air because of their soulless abilities. My favorite book-recommend-er felt like this book was lacking because of the fact that Conall and Alexia spent the vast majority of it apart. There was very little, if any, steamy snogging in this book. I still liked it though. Some of the plot twists were quite unexpected (Oh Biffy!!) and I was happy to again be surprised. I was a tid bit confused by the scientific experiments though- Does Alexia actually have a soul- just one that's not connected to anything? What the heck are aether and pneuma? And what the heck kind of child have Conall and Alexia conceived?! I am happy to be asking these questions as it means that I will be following Alexia through her next adventure (motherhood apparently) in the next book which I believe is called "Heartless". Hmmm. intriguing.
4.5/5 - I couldn't quite give it a 5/5 because I couldn't quite love it as much as Soulless. *oh and I love this cover! So much better than Changeless!*
In a snug New England fishing village, Charlie St. Cloud tends the lawns and monuments of an ancient cemetery where his younger brother, Sam, is buried. After surviving the car accident that claimed his brother's life, Charlie is graced with an extraordinary gift: He can see, talk to, and even play catch with Sam's spirit. Into this magical world comes Tess Carroll, a captivating woman training for a solo sailing trip around the globe. Fate steers her boat into a treacherous storm that propels her into Charlie's life. Their beautiful and uncommon connection leads to a race against time and a choice between death and life, between the past and the future, between holding on and letting go - and the discovery that miracles can happen if we simply open our hearts.
This was an OK book and was made into an OK movie. A little bit 6th Sense meets The Notebook. When I was reading it and got to the twist in the story I was spitting mad. (Just ask the hubby- I was reading in bed and started yelling at the book) Don't worry- I got over it by the end. This book did made me cry a couple times, and it is emotional material. Charlie has a lot of survivor's guilt because he lived (or was brought back to life) after a car accident. I did prefer the fireman's story line in the book, but understand why that would be too tragic to put on the big screen in an otherwise heavy story. Also, I preferred the time-line in the book. In the movie, Charlie was 18 when they got in the accident and on his way to a party. It's much more bitter-sweet in the book- he is 15 and driving the neighbor's car to take Sam to a baseball game. They have the dog in the car too, which (of course) I liked better about the book. It was just really sweet that the boy and his dog appeared every sunset to hang out with Charlie. Anyway, 10 years goes by in the book, and in the movie it's only 5 years.
The romance was more tangible in the book as well, but was pretty well done for the movie. Tess was more vibrant in the book, but was so-so in the movie. I do wish that the book and movie could have had the same ending. (It pretty much is... with one exception) In the book, Charlie gets to see what Sam would have become as a grown man, but in the book, they say "No one gets to see what would have been". It was sad, because I thought that was one of the most touching scenes in the book.
The casting:
For Sam- perfection. The kid they cast for Sam nailed the role. I loved him!
Tess- meh, so-so. I think she was under-whelming. Her character is so spunky and strong in the book and I didn't get enough of that in the movie.
Charlie- ugh. Oh Zac Efron. He was not the best choice for this role. My favorite critic review of him is "The surreal thing is, Zac Efron can't do despair. He plays it by staring. Blankly. And by not smiling. Blankly." That is pretty darn accurate. He's not good at not being happy. I mean- he sure is pretty, but not good at sad.
My overall rating for both is "Just OK", so probably 2.5/5. I didn't dislike either, but wouldn't run out and demand that my friends read/watch them.
Here's a little snippet from the movie for you:
I know- this is the blog I promised so long ago! Waaaaaaay back in October? Yes. That’s embarrassing.
To be fair, I have had the bedroom done for nearly a month and photos were taken 2 weeks ago, but you know how it goes once the Christmas season hits. So folks, without further ado, the bedroom post:
I started this project back in September I think- I really wanted a new comforter. Our brown one from our first bedroom was worn and just a bit skeazy looking, plus it didn’t match the tones of the browns on the wall in the bedroom. Here is the old brown one:
I love love love our down comforter and really wanted to find a duvet cover for it, but I gave up on that search after weeks of looking. There are just not good options out there for duvets (unless, of course, you make it yourself- which I just didn’t feel like doing). I THOUGHT I had a solution when I found this bright yellow beauty of a comforter.Here's the preview pic:
It looked awesome in the store. Bright. Fresh. Different. Cheery. And Yellow! (For some reason, I was fixated on incorporating yellow into the new bedroom-it’s just such a HAPPY color!) After 3 days of “trying it out” I just couldn’t take it. It didn’t convey the right mood to the room. It was too juvenile I think. I stuffed it back into the box-ish and I toted it back to Target. I have become braver about returning things these days. They took it back and were a little chagrined that I didn’t quite get it all back in that itty bitty box. Whoops. Well that was about an $80 set for 2 pillow shams and comforter. I wanted to keep my next find around the same price point and so began my search… I searched at Target, JC Penny, Macy’s, and Kohls both online and in stores. Then, I got a coupon to Bed Bath and Beyond and had leftover gift card money from our wedding to the store (lame I know- it took me more than a year to spend it). So I trooped over to BB and B and found a beautiful quilt and matching shams. I was in LOVE! And it was on SALE! And I had a COUPON! And I had a GIFT CARD! It was almost too much to take in. So, it ended up being slightly more expensive (like by $10) with all of the above discounts –which was golden as far as I am concerned. Isn’t it purdy??
So- with the bed spread finally decided I could turn my attentions toward the rest of the room. Here are some before and after’s for you:
![]() | |
| Before |
| After! |
Dresser views:
![]() |
| Before- lots of reds |
| After |
| I re-painted the black shelves and little yellow birdy |
| I got the Van-Gogh print on Ebay and just put it in the frame we had there |
This frame was red, as you can see above. I had gotten it on super-sale at Hobby Lobby. I never really loved it because the saying on it was "If you love something you have to let it go and if it comes back to you it was meant to be, if it doesn't it wasn't mean to be" or something like that. I just never loved that sentiment. So, I spray painted it along with my lamps (you can see below) and shelves (pictured above) and then went to town with puffy paint! I used one of my pillows from my living room and from Lindsay at Aisle to Aloha and her pretty dahlia painting as inspiration. I will be honest, I don't love the way it turned out. I would just leave off the dark brown and do it all in gold if I could re-do it, but everyone who sees it likes it, so it stays.
![]() |
| Before- pretty boxes |
| After! |
| The vase was $7 at Target on clearance! |
I covered the decorative boxes with muslin, then the zebra print fabric. I used a hot glue gun and pretty much wrapped them like presents. I love the result! Still great for storage and they match the room, bringing in a little bit of the wild! haha
Now if I had to choose, these might be my favorite addition to the room:
| Ahh- curtains! |
Now- I first saw these amazing curtains on Thrifty Decor Chick's site. She found them at JC Penny for $12.99 per panel. Awesome! Especially when the orginal price is something like $80 PER PANEL. So, of course, I surfed right over to JCPenny.com and made my purchase, only to receive a disappointing phone call a few hours later to tell me that they had sold out. Well, I would not be dismayed. I then hopped right on over to Ebay! I found a seller who had these curtains in a rust color. I emailed her and found out (Oh happy day!) that she did have the gold, but hadn't listed them yet. She emailed me when she listed them and I immediately bought them. I paid about $15 per panel and $10 in shipping- so a $40 set of curtains, plus $10 or so for a rod and curtain hangers. Not too shabby! I also have a room darkening set of curtains under them as well, because I am all about it being dark. I used Thrifty Decor Chick's method of hanging the curtains as well and just used shower rings (hey- I had a pack just laying around!) to hang up the room-darkening shades underneath.
My other project for this room was the lamps. I love the creamy beige color that they ended up as. They began as bronze, had a short stint as a terrifying yellow color (sorry- no pics of that) and finally the beige. I also love the canvas lampshades and like the texture they bring into the room.
So there. Finally. I hope it was worth the wait. We really, really, really love the way it looks! Hope you do too!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)





















